Sharper judgement where wind resource evidence meets bankability.

Founder-led analysis and independent challenge for developers, owners, investors, and advisory teams. OBRAVEN helps decide what to measure, what to trust and whether the energy yield basis is ready for the next project gate – onshore and offshore, in Ireland and international markets.

Founder

Stan Herasymenko, founder of OBRAVEN

Founded by Stan Herasymenko. 17+ years across measurement delivery, technical advisory and developer-side leadership at Mainstream Renewable Power, DNV and ENERPARK, including leadership of Mainstream’s global Energy Analysis Group. Career experience includes 200+ measurement stations specified or overseen, 300+ resource and energy-yield assessments delivered or reviewed, and 1,000+ layout and turbine scenarios analysed or overseen. OBRAVEN brings that depth to defined assignments and ongoing senior support.

Core capabilities

  • Wind resource assessment and energy yield analysis – including measured and modelled data, layout, wakes, blockage, losses, uncertainty, and 8760 outputs
  • Measurement strategy and procurement support – onshore and offshore, including met masts, ground-based and floating LiDAR, and other remote sensing
  • Independent review and workstream leadership – consultant or seller EYA review, acquisition, financing or repowering challenge, and coordination of consultants, suppliers, data, and inputs

Who this is for

  • Developers preparing for investment or finance decisions who want technical objections surfaced early
  • Investors and asset owners who need a credible second opinion on contractor, consultant, or seller cases
  • Lean development, investment, and advisory teams needing senior wind resource or energy-yield assessment capability without a permanent team

Typical decision situations

Energy analysis often starts long before the finance-stage EYA. Measurement, layout, turbine, wake, blockage, loss and uncertainty assumptions evolve through development. OBRAVEN helps teams keep that analytical basis controlled, proportionate and traceable – and challenge it before the number is priced or relied on.

What is the current energy-yield basis?

Hidden risk

The current estimate may still reflect an earlier layout, turbine, measurement or loss basis that no longer matches the project.

How we help

We prepare or update the wind-resource and energy-yield analysis on an agreed basis, including wakes, blockage, losses, uncertainty, sensitivities and controlled outputs.

How should the measurement campaign be structured?

Hidden risk

Measurement campaigns can be over-scoped, under-designed, or badly sequenced – leaving clients with either wasted spend or data that will not stand up when bankability matters.

How we help

We design onshore and offshore measurement strategy from the decision backward – sizing scope, sequencing, procurement, and supplier obligations to what the project actually needs to prove at investment and finance stage.

Will the evidence stand up at finance stage?

Hidden risk

A campaign can look compliant on paper yet still fail through weak supplier obligations, QA, maintenance, monitoring, or escalation.

How we help

We help teams set up and govern measurement programmes so that RFPs, contracts, supplier scope, maintenance expectations, review rhythms, and escalation paths are aligned to one objective – a robust finance-grade evidence base at proportionate cost.

Do the key workstreams add up?

Hidden risk

Technical studies can all be completed and signed off, yet still fail to add up to a financeable, decision-ready project.

How we help

We connect outputs across energy yield, layout optimisation, turbine choice, noise, and related disciplines so the combined picture is judged against bankability, deliverability, and technical-commercial consequence – not just report-by-report completion.

Do we need a measurement campaign at all?

Hidden risk

Projects often default to new measurement spend before anyone proves the decision really needs it.

How we help

We assess whether the right route is a full new campaign, a reduced scope, a different evidence base, or no new measurements at all – protecting decision quality without buying unnecessary work.

What should we procure or rely on?

Hidden risk

Measurement, monitoring, layout, modelling, and energy assessment tools or services are often chosen through habit or legacy preference rather than fit for purpose.

How we help

We scope the real need first, then compare relevant tools or services on fitness for purpose, integration, downstream use, and commercial logic – rather than inertia or internal preference.

Next step

Bring one live project question. Share the project stage, the decision ahead, the analysis or data already available and any deadline. In a short call, OBRAVEN will confirm whether it is the right fit and the narrowest useful next step.